Freddie Potts
2025/26 season archive
Potts is not in a 2026/27 Premier League squad, so these figures are final rather than live. Browse 2026/27 players.
West Ham
How he ranks
22 games · 141 midfielders
Points is what drags him — 2nd of 141, against 2nd for points.
Minutes and bonus
Where the points come from
84% of his points earned came from appearance. That is a narrow base — if it stops, most of the return stops with it. 38 earned, 37 net
Are the returns real?
His goals and assists are in line with the chances behind them — −0.3 against expectation over 1162 minutes.
Defensive Contribution
He averages 5.4 against a line of 12, so DefCon is not a realistic source of points for him.
Against each level of opponent
His return barely moves with the difficulty of the opponent.
1 is the easiest opponent, 5 the hardest. Bracketed figure is appearances at that level.
Gameweek log
| Opponent | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUN (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 2 | CHE (H) | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 3 | NFO (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 4 | TOT (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 5 | CRY (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 6 | EVE (A) | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 7 | ARS (A) | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 8 | BRE (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 9 | LEE (A) | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 10 | NEW (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 11 | BUR (H) | 61 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 19 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 12 | BOU (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 13 | LIV (H) | 87 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 16 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 14 | MUN (A) | 82 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 15 | BHA (A) | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 16 | AVL (H) | 87 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 29 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 17 | MCI (A) | 78 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 19 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 18 | FUL (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 19 | BHA (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 20 | WOL (A) | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 21 | NFO (H) | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 22 | TOT (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 23 | SUN (H) | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 24 | CHE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 25 | BUR (A) | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 26 | MUN (H) | 79 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 27 | BOU (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 28 | LIV (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 29 | FUL (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 30 | MCI (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 31 | AVL (A) | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 32 | WOL (H) | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 33 | CRY (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 34 | EVE (H) | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 35 | BRE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 36 | ARS (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 37 | NEW (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 38 | LEE (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
What the model expects
From the same expected-points model that runs across the whole player pool — an estimate per gameweek, not a prediction of any single one.
Direction = last five gameweeks vs the five before. The model is injury-blind.
Points by gameweek · with model expectation
GW13–23: model expected 23 pts · he scored 18 (−5 vs expectation)