Santiago Ignacio Bueno
2025/26 season archive
S.Bueno is not in a 2026/27 Premier League squad, so these figures are final rather than live. Browse 2026/27 players.
Wolves
How he ranks
29 games · 119 defenders
Minutes and bonus
Where the points come from
51% of his points earned came from appearance. No single source dominates, though bonus tends to follow whichever one leads. 111 earned, 92 net
Are the returns real?
His goals and assists are in line with the chances behind them — +1.3 against expectation over 2552 minutes.
Goals and assists minus xGI, per season. Positive means he finished above the chances he had.
Defensive Contribution
He averages 7.4 against a line of 10 — close enough that a busy game gets him there, but not reliably.
Against each level of opponent
He scores 2.4 more per game against the easiest opponents he faced than the hardest — a fixture-dependent asset.
1 is the easiest opponent, 5 the hardest. Bracketed figure is appearances at that level.
Gameweek log
| Opponent | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MCI (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 2 | BOU (A) | 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 3 | EVE (H) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 4 | NEW (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 5 | LEE (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 6 | TOT (A) | 90 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 32 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 7 | BHA (H) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 8 | SUN (A) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 9 | BUR (H) | 90 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 15 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 10 | FUL (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 11 | CHE (A) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 12 | CRY (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 13 | AVL (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 14 | NFO (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 15 | MUN (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 16 | ARS (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 17 | BRE (H) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 18 | LIV (A) | 90 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 19 | MUN (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 20 | WHU (H) | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 21 | EVE (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 22 | NEW (H) | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 23 | MCI (A) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 24 | BOU (H) | 88 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 25 | CHE (H) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 26 | NFO (A) | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 21 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 26 | ARS (H) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 27 | CRY (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 28 | AVL (H) | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 24 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 29 | LIV (H) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 30 | BRE (A) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 32 | WHU (A) | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 0 | -3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 33 | LEE (A) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 34 | TOT (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 17 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 35 | SUN (H) | 90 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 26 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 36 | BHA (A) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | -5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 37 | FUL (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 38 | BUR (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
What the model expects
From the same expected-points model that runs across the whole player pool — an estimate per gameweek, not a prediction of any single one.
Direction = last five gameweeks vs the five before. The model is injury-blind.
Points by gameweek · with model expectation
GW8–38: model expected 70 pts · he scored 65 (−5 vs expectation)