Toti Gomes
2025/26 season archive
Toti is not in a 2026/27 Premier League squad, so these figures are final rather than live. Browse 2026/27 players.
Wolves
How he ranks
19 games · 119 defenders
Minutes and bonus
Where the points come from
63% of his points earned came from appearance. That is a narrow base — if it stops, most of the return stops with it. 54 earned, 41 net
Are the returns real?
His goals and assists are in line with the chances behind them — −0.8 against expectation over 1423 minutes.
Goals and assists minus xGI, per season. Positive means he finished above the chances he had.
Defensive Contribution
He averages 7.5 against a line of 10 — close enough that a busy game gets him there, but not reliably.
Against each level of opponent
His return barely moves with the difficulty of the opponent.
1 is the easiest opponent, 5 the hardest. Bracketed figure is appearances at that level.
Gameweek log
| Opponent | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MCI (H) | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 2 | BOU (A) | 48 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | -9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0 | 1 | £4.5m |
| 3 | EVE (H) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 4 | NEW (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 5 | LEE (H) | 71 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 6 | TOT (A) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 7 | BHA (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 8 | SUN (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 9 | BUR (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 10 | FUL (A) | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 11 | CHE (A) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 12 | CRY (H) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 13 | AVL (A) | 90 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 19 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 14 | NFO (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 15 | MUN (H) | 69 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 16 | ARS (A) | 85 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 17 | BRE (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 18 | LIV (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 19 | MUN (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 20 | WHU (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 21 | EVE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 22 | NEW (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 23 | MCI (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 24 | BOU (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 25 | CHE (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 26 | NFO (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 26 | ARS (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 27 | CRY (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 28 | AVL (H) | 90 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 28 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 29 | LIV (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 30 | BRE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 32 | WHU (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 33 | LEE (A) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 34 | TOT (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 35 | SUN (H) | 90 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 15 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 36 | BHA (A) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 37 | FUL (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 38 | BUR (A) | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
What the model expects
From the same expected-points model that runs across the whole player pool — an estimate per gameweek, not a prediction of any single one.
Direction = last five gameweeks vs the five before. The model is injury-blind.
Points by gameweek · with model expectation
GW8–38: model expected 24 pts · he scored 21 (−3 vs expectation)