Mads Hermansen
2025/26 season archive
Hermansen is not in a 2026/27 Premier League squad, so these figures are final rather than live. Browse 2026/27 players.
West Ham
How he ranks
18 games · 23 goalkeepers
Minutes and bonus
Where the points come from
42% of his points earned came from appearance. No single source dominates, though bonus tends to follow whichever one leads. 85 earned, 76 net
Are the returns real?
His goals and assists are in line with the chances behind them — +1.0 against expectation over 1620 minutes.
Goals and assists minus xGI, per season. Positive means he finished above the chances he had.
Against each level of opponent
He scores 2.5 more per game against the easiest opponents he faced than the hardest — a fixture-dependent asset.
1 is the easiest opponent, 5 the hardest. Bracketed figure is appearances at that level.
Gameweek log
| Opponent | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUN (A) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 2 | CHE (H) | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 3 | NFO (A) | 90 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 4 | TOT (H) | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 5 | CRY (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 6 | EVE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 7 | ARS (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.5m |
| 8 | BRE (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 9 | LEE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 10 | NEW (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 11 | BUR (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 12 | BOU (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.4m |
| 13 | LIV (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 14 | MUN (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 15 | BHA (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 16 | AVL (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 17 | MCI (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 18 | FUL (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 19 | BHA (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 20 | WOL (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.3m |
| 21 | NFO (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 22 | TOT (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 23 | SUN (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 24 | CHE (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 25 | BUR (A) | 90 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 26 | MUN (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 27 | BOU (H) | 90 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 28 | LIV (A) | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 29 | FUL (A) | 90 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 38 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 30 | MCI (H) | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 31 | AVL (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 32 | WOL (H) | 90 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 33 | CRY (A) | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 34 | EVE (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 35 | BRE (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 36 | ARS (H) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 37 | NEW (A) | 90 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
| 38 | LEE (H) | 90 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | £4.2m |
What the model expects
From the same expected-points model that runs across the whole player pool — an estimate per gameweek, not a prediction of any single one.
Direction = last five gameweeks vs the five before. The model is injury-blind.
Points by gameweek · with model expectation
GW8–38: model expected 45 pts · he scored 55 (+10 vs expectation)