Pablo Felipe Pereira de Jesus
2025/26 season archive
Pablo is not in a 2026/27 Premier League squad, so these figures are final rather than live. Browse 2026/27 players.
West Ham
Minutes and bonus
Where the points come from
88% of his points earned came from appearance. That is a narrow base — if it stops, most of the return stops with it. 26 earned
Defensive Contribution
He averages 5.1 against a line of 12, so DefCon is not a realistic source of points for him.
Against each level of opponent
His return barely moves with the difficulty of the opponent.
1 is the easiest opponent, 5 the hardest. Bracketed figure is appearances at that level.
Gameweek log
| Opponent | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | WOL (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 21 | NFO (H) | 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 22 | TOT (A) | 78 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 23 | SUN (H) | 69 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 24 | CHE (A) | 65 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 25 | BUR (A) | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 26 | MUN (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 27 | BOU (H) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 28 | LIV (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £5.5m |
| 29 | FUL (A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 30 | MCI (H) | 63 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 31 | AVL (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 32 | WOL (H) | 77 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 24 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 33 | CRY (A) | 74 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 34 | EVE (H) | 80 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 35 | BRE (A) | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 36 | ARS (H) | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 37 | NEW (A) | 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
| 38 | LEE (H) | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | £5.4m |
What the model expects
From the same expected-points model that runs across the whole player pool — an estimate per gameweek, not a prediction of any single one.
Direction = last five gameweeks vs the five before. The model is injury-blind.
Points by gameweek · with model expectation
GW24–38: model expected 20 pts · he scored 12 (−8 vs expectation)